Fair Shot 基本保證收入是否是社會公義的解藥?

I actually like his idea, but need to research more into the potential effects and other implications.

“While artificial intelligence will likely bring down the cost of some goods, costs will likely continue to rise in the industries that most rely on human expertise like education and health care.”

In the meantime, the experience of failure he shared was equally important
“I learned how counterproductive unbridled idealism can be if it lacks practical grounding in the here and now.”

臉書共同創辦人之一的新書,講到美國日益劇烈的貧富不均問題。基本上我很認同他的觀點,國際化與自動化(科技)讓物品可能便宜了,但讓避免陷入貧窮所需的事物,如住房,醫療,和教育,變得更加昂貴”

在廿一世紀,的確該廣義的思考“工作”的定義,並依此重新設計工作和基本社會福利制度(教育和醫療等等)。

作者也特別提到他後來失敗的事業經驗,讓他體會到好的理想,即使是最善意的,都不能沒有具體落實的經營模式支撐。倒過來說,有什麼樣的運營模式可以適合不同的扶貧項目,真的是可以好好研究一下。

關於此書的一些中文介紹 (請忽略標題,那不是重點)

https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/48366/facebook-cofounder-chris-hughes-fateful-conversation-with-zuckerberg

One Reply to “Fair Shot 基本保證收入是否是社會公義的解藥?”

Leave a Reply